PDA

View Full Version : Study-Preschoolers think everything by McDonalds is better


KristiB
08-07-2007, 12:50 PM
There's a rant in me somewhere but I just can't muster it up right now...I don't know where to start...branding...preschoolers eating fast food...:(

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/national/20070807_Mickey_Ds_wrappers_trick_kids_taste_buds. html?

Mickey D's wrappers trick kids' taste buds
Associated Press

CHICAGO - Anything made by McDonald's tastes better, preschoolers said in a study that powerfully demonstrates how advertising can affect the taste buds of young children.

Even carrots, milk and apple juice tasted better to the kids when they were wrapped in the familiar packaging of the Golden Arches.

The study had youngsters sample identical McDonald's foods in name-brand and unmarked wrappers. The unmarked foods always lost the taste test.

Study author Dr. Tom Robinson, of Stanford University, said the kids' perception of taste was "physically altered by the branding."

The study involved 63 low-income children ages 3 to 5 from Head Start centers in San Mateo County, Calif. Robinson believes the results would be similar for children from more well-to-do families.

The research appears in August's Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine and likely will stir more debate over the movement to restrict ads to kids. It comes less than a month after 11 major food and drink companies, including McDonald's, announced curbs on marketing to children under 12.

But Dr. Victor Strasburger, an author of an American Academy of Pediatrics policy urging limits on marketing to children, said the study shows that too little is being done.

"It's an amazing study and it's very sad," Strasburger said.

"Advertisers have tried to do exactly what this study is talking about - to brand younger and younger children, to instill in them an almost obsessional desire for a particular brand-name product," he said.

Just two of the 63 children studied said they'd never eaten at McDonald's, and about one-third ate there at least weekly. Most recognized the McDonald's logo, but it was mentioned to those who didn't.

The study included three McDonald's menu items - hamburgers, chicken nuggets and french fries - and store-bought milk or juice and carrots. Children got two identical samples of each food on a tray, one in McDonald's wrappers or cups and the other in plain, unmarked packaging. The kids were asked if they tasted the same or if one was better. (Some children didn't taste all the foods.)

McDonald's-labeled samples were the clear favorites. French fries were the biggest winner; almost 77 percent said the labeled fries tasted best, and only 13 percent preferred the others.

Fifty-four percent preferred McDonald's-wrapped carrots versus 23 percent who liked the plain-wrapped sample.

The only results not statistically clear-cut involved the hamburgers, with 29 kids choosing McDonald's-wrapped burgers and 22 choosing the unmarked ones.

Fewer than one-fourth of the children said both samples of all foods tasted the same. *

lindrusso
08-07-2007, 01:13 PM
I had a BIG problem with the assumptions they were making with this study.

They are using this study to say that marketing to kids has a huge influence on their preferences. I'm sorry, but I'd say that it's actually EATING at McDonald's that causes the positive assocation, not the marketing.

Let's say that we don't have a TV, but my child eats at McD every day and loves it. I think it's quite possible that my child would choose the McD carrots over the plain, not because of marketing, but because he associates the McD name with food he loves.

If they really wanted to see what influence MARKETING had over the kids, they should have done this study with kids who watch TV, but have never eaten at McD. But wait, maybe there aren't any kids out there that haven't eaten at McD....... ;) I'm sure they could find some out there somewhere if they really tried.

Still, I think that it's more likely that the association they have with EATING at McD has more to do with their preferences than watching ads on TV. Perhaps it's the marketing that makes them want to eat there in the first place, but ultimately it's the PARENTS who are responsible for allowing them to eat fast food. This study was for kids 12 and under, so it can't be argued that they are going to McD on their own. So really, it's not a big stretch to blame the study results on parents, not marketing.

LA98
08-07-2007, 01:23 PM
I agree with lindrusso completely. I was also thinking, knowing preschoolers like I do :rolleyes: :) , that if they had wrapped one food in colorful packaging with pictures of animals or whatever on it and the identical food in a plain white wrapper, I'm guessing they'd go for the "fun" one.

And while I do think McDonald's is an evil empire, the blame still lies 100% with the parents. My soon-to-be 4-year-old sees commercials for McDonald's, Chuck E Cheese and so on, and asks if we can go. And I say no. :)

lindrusso
08-07-2007, 01:31 PM
I agree with lindrusso completely. I was also thinking, knowing preschoolers like I do :rolleyes: :) , that if they had wrapped one food in colorful packaging with pictures of animals or whatever on it and the identical food in a plain white wrapper, I'm guessing they'd go for the "fun" one.
:)

True - it may be as simple as plain wrapper versus more colorful wrapper.

To discount this, they should have tested McD wrapper versus something other than just plain wrapping - like a big smiley face or something else colorful and friendly.

Way, way too many holes in this study.........

stacy7272
08-07-2007, 02:36 PM
DS wrote an "essay" (he was in first grade so it was about 2 or 3 sentences) saying that McDonalds is really bad for you because it has too much salt. I laughed and asked his teacher about this. She said that one day one child mentioned going to McDonalds and another child said, "oooh that's bad for you!" So she opened up a discussion about it.

We just don't do fast food and I always talk about why foods are healthy or unhealthy with him. So I think that maybe some kids would have bad associations with that brand. Maybe the results could be different with higher-income families.

lindrusso
08-07-2007, 02:40 PM
Maybe the results could be different with higher-income families.

I doubt it. Most families I know are not low-income and most of them eat fast food. I'd bet that those kid would choose the McD packaging too.

We also eat fast food, but not often and we talk to our kids a lot about nutrition, etc. For us, fast food isn't evil, just something to be wary of and not something to eat on a regular basis.

lisas3575
08-07-2007, 02:58 PM
Perhaps it's the marketing that makes them want to eat there in the first place, but ultimately it's the PARENTS who are responsible for allowing them to eat fast food. This study was for kids 12 and under, so it can't be argued that they are going to McD on their own. So really, it's not a big stretch to blame the study results on parents, not marketing.

Amen, Sistah! I'll even take it a step further, and point out that parents have (some) control over the advertising too. Parents can limit how much advertising their kids are exposed to, at least at home, by turning OFF the idiot box and doing something constructive with their kids.

mgs
08-07-2007, 03:09 PM
this is funny/sad/true

about 3 months ago I went for a 4 day trip to SF with my mom leaving my Fast Food loving husband at home with our -at the time - 22 month old. DS doesn't watch any commercial tv. What little tv he does watch is Sesame Street which is DVR'd and I watch with him. Just to point out how few commercials he sees.

When I got back we all took a Saturday morning trip to the Home Depot which happened to also have a Burger King in the parking lot. DS started to yell "burger burger burger!" I looked at DH and said, "How does he know that is Burger King" DH said, 'OH we went there a few times" ok........a few times in 4 days? FIrst of all a few times in 4 days is too many, but that is all it took. DS was in love..

Luckily at 22 months they have short attention spans and are finicky eaters. I can't get him to eat a burger homemade or not anymore and we haven't been to Burger King since.

I also found some problems with the true science in this article. Leaves a lot of questions unanswered, but for sure the blame can be placed on the parents IMHO. I mean, a preschooler doesn't learn these things unless they are exposed either through TV or actually going to the joint. Also, very good point about the wrappers - I hadn't thought of that angle.

Robyn1007
08-07-2007, 03:43 PM
One of the saddest things I've ever witnessed is my step brother, who lives with his mother (my step father's ex) came to visit them when he was around 8. It was only the second time he'd ever been allowed to visit them, all other visits were short and my step father had to go there. He didn't know how to use silverware. At all. His mother is a surgeon who works long hours so rather than fix healthy home-cooked meals she ALWAYS stopped for fast food. If you think about it virtually all fast food is eaten with our hands. :( They spent that whole month he was there working on how to eat with a fork and knife and convincing him that every meal didn't need to be fast food or covered in ketchup.

He was 12 last summer when he came to visit while I was in Houston for a month. I have never been so frustrated trying to feed anybody. I made homemade chocolate pudding but he didn't like it, not sweet enough. I can't remember what else I made while he was there but he only picked at it for sure.

Gail
08-07-2007, 04:00 PM
That is an absolute jaw dropper to read of Robyn's step-brother.

Working as I have been on a weight loss site, I'm only recently getting people to open up and talk about the kinds of foods they're eating: fast food, of course, heads the list. The assumption is made by so many of our members that seeing McDonald's induces drooling. I can't even relate to that notion (which is not to say we don't eat and enjoy fast food, simply that I've never found McDonald's to resemble anything I'd call edible.)

Frankly, I resent the notion that having children = McDonald's. It doesn't have to be so unless Mom and Dad allow it to be so.

LaraW
08-07-2007, 04:18 PM
But wait, maybe there aren't any kids out there that haven't eaten at McD....... ;) I'm sure they could find some out there somewhere if they really tried.
.

If they looked at my house, they'd find 2 kids who had never eaten at McD's. :o

lindrusso
08-07-2007, 06:18 PM
If they looked at my house, they'd find 2 kids who had never eaten at McD's. :o

I figured someone here would point that out, but it was really just a tongue-in-cheek statement....... :)