PDA

View Full Version : Moussaoui Says He Was to Hijack 5th Plane


jmarie
03-27-2006, 12:05 PM
I am stunned that he would admit this.

By MATTHEW BARAKAT
Associated Press Writer


Al-Qaida conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui testified Monday that he and would-be shoe bomber Richard Reid were supposed to hijack a fifth airplane on Sept. 11, 2001, and fly it into the White House.

Moussaoui's testimony on his own behalf stunned the courtroom. His account was in stark contrast to his previous statements in which he said the White House attack was to come later if the United States refused to release a radical Egyptian sheik imprisoned on earlier terrorist convictions.



On Dec. 22, 2001, Reid was subdued by passengers when he attempted to detonate a bomb in his shoe aboard American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami. There were 197 people on board. The plane was diverted to Boston, where it landed safely.

Moussaoui told the court he knew the World Trade Center attack was coming and that he lied to investigators when arrested in August 2001 because he wanted it to happen.

"You lied because you wanted to conceal that you were a member of al- Qaida?" prosecutor Rob Spencer asked.

"That's correct," Moussaoui said.

Spencer: "You lied so the plan could go forward?"

Moussaoui: "That's correct."

The exchange was key to the government's case that the attacks might have been averted if Moussaoui had been more cooperative following his arrest.

Moussaoui told the court he knew the attacks were coming some time after August 2001 and bought a radio so he could hear them unfold.

Specifically, he said he knew the World Trade Center was going to be attacked, but asserted he was not part of that plot and didn't know the details.

Nineteen men pulled off the Sept. 11 attacks on New York in Washington in the worst act of terrorism ever on U.S. soil.

"I had knowledge that the Twin Towers would be hit," Moussaoui said. "I didn't know the details of this."

Asked by his lawyer why he signed his guilty plea in April as "the 20th hijacker," Moussaoui replied: "Because everybody used to refer to me as the 20th hijacker and it was a bit of fun."

Before Moussaoui took the stand, his lawyers made a last attempt to stop him from testifying, but failed. Defense attorney Gerald Zerkin argued that his client would not be a competent witness because he has contempt for the court, only recognizes Islamic law and therefore "the affirmation he undertakes would be meaningless."

Moussaoui at first denied he was to have been a fifth hijack pilot Sept. 11 but under cross examination spoke of the plan that would have him attack the White House. He said Reid was the only person he knew for sure would have been on that mission, but others were discussed.

The 19 terrorists on Sept. 11 hijacked and crashed four airliners, killing nearly 3,000 people in the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and on the planes. The intended target of the plane that crashed into a Pennsylvania field remains unknown.

Moussaoui said he talked with an al-Qaida official in 1999 about why a 1993 bombing at the World Trade Center failed to bring the towers down. He said "was asked in the same period for the first time if I want to be a suicide pilot and I declined."

Just before Moussaoui took the stand, the court heard testimony that two months before the attacks that a CIA deputy chief waited in vain for permission to tell the FBI about a "very high interest" al-Qaida operative who became one of the hijackers.

The official, a senior figure in the CIA's Osama bin Laden unit, said he sought authorization on July 13, 2001, to send information to the FBI but got no response for 10 days, then asked again.

As it turned out, the information on Khalid al-Mihdhar did not reach the FBI until late August. At the time, CIA officers needed permission from a special unit before passing certain intelligence on to the FBI.

The official was identified only as John. His written testimony was read into the record.

"John's" testimony was part of the defense's case that federal authorities missed multiple opportunities to catch hijackers and perhaps thwart the 9/11 plot.

His testimony included an e-mail sent by FBI supervisor Michael Maltbie discussing Moussaoui but playing down his terrorist connections. Maltbie's e-mail said "there's no indication that (Moussaoui) had plans for any nefarious activity."

He sent that e-mail to the CIA even after receiving a lengthy memo from the FBI agent who arrested Moussaoui and suspected him of being a terrorist with plans to hijack aircraft.

Prosecutors argue that Moussaoui, a French citizen, thwarted a prime opportunity to track down the 9/11 hijackers and possibly unravel the plot when he was arrested in August 2001 on immigration violations and lied to the FBI about his al-Qaida membership and plans to hijack a plane.

Had Moussaoui confessed, the FBI could have pursued leads that would have led them to most of the hijackers, government witnesses have testified.

To win the death penalty, prosecutors must first prove that Moussaoui's actions _ specifically, his lies _ were directly responsible for at least one death on Sept. 11.

If they fail, Moussaoui would get life in prison.

SandyM
03-27-2006, 01:08 PM
I'm surprised that this would actually surprise anyone.

blazedog
03-27-2006, 01:22 PM
I'm surprised that this would actually surprise anyone.

Given the enormous energy and time he and his attorneys have spent in preparing a defense, my surprise is that he would then get on the stand and essentially throw his defense away. He had no reason to take the stand -- especially since his testimony would only serve to make it MORE likely rather than LESS likely that he would receive the death penalty.

Of course as a crackpot adherent to the idea of jihad and martyrdom, I guess an explanation is that in his lunatic evil twisted mind, he will go straight to heaven complete with the 40 virgins if he is killed by agents of the evil West and Israel. :p

Robyn1007
03-27-2006, 02:02 PM
My guess would be that he feels guilty for not being able to perform his assigned task and his way of getting back at western society is to show that he had the power to stop it and he didn't. I'd bet that he believes his death will be an honor knowing that he helped to cause the death of so many that day. I'm also not surprised at all that he would testify to that, my guess is he has planned the revelation all along and didn't tell his attorneys on purpose. While I hadn't thought about the possibility of a revelation it doesn't surprise me for a second.

honeygirl1971
03-27-2006, 02:08 PM
He has been saying this stuff for a long time from what I have read in papers here. The judge told him a while back, "you are your own worst enemy." His attorneys have not been able to control him and he has not cooperated with them. According to what I have read here, no one in Al-Qaeda has actually claimed him as a member of their organization. He may be, he may not be. His mother (who has been estranged from him for a while) says he has major mental problems. He's clearly psychotic and sociopathic (and belongs in some kind of facility for the criminally insane, IMO), but whether or not he was actually part of the 9/11 plot is unclear and probably never will be clear.

jmarie
03-27-2006, 02:20 PM
He has been saying this stuff for a long time from what I have read in papers here. The judge told him a while back, "you are your own worst enemy." His attorneys have not been able to control him and he has not cooperated with them. According to what I have read here, no one in Al-Qaeda has actually claimed him as a member of their organization. He may be, he may not be. His mother (who has been estranged from him for a while) says he has major mental problems. He's clearly psychotic and sociopathic (and belongs in some kind of facility for the criminally insane, IMO), but whether or not he was actually part of the 9/11 plot is unclear and probably never will be clear.

I appreciate that. I had seen where the judge told him a while back, "you are your own worst enemy. But from what I understood, he had been denying everything up until this point, is why this surprised me.

honeygirl1971
03-27-2006, 03:10 PM
...But from what I understood, he had been denying everything up until this point, is why this surprised me.

Yeah, I don't know. I read an article months ago that talked about how he was claiming to be in on the whole plot etc. That article didn't mention the shoe-bomber, though, that's a new development from what I've read previously.