PDA

View Full Version : Just in case you were feeling sorry for Brit


luv2run
06-29-2006, 06:38 AM
Pregnant Spears Poses Nude for Magazine


NEW YORK (AP) - Pregnant pop princess Britney Spears is baring nearly all on the cover of Harper's Bazaar magazine. The singer of "... Baby, One More Time" posed in the buff for the cover of the August issue; there's also a photo spread inside.

On the cover, Spears, who is sitting, cups her breasts with her hands and crosses her legs while showing her protruding belly and smiling for the camera of lensman Alexi Lubomirski.

"Nothing to wear?" a cover headline asks. "487 Best new ideas inside."

Spears revealed to late-night talk show host David Letterman last month that she was pregnant, confirming media reports and ending much speculation.

Spears, 24, and her husband, Kevin Federline, have a son, Sean Preston, who was born last September.

http://www.chiff.com/graphics/britney-spears-pregnant.jpg


How you would you like to see that without clothes with your morning cup of Starbucks???? I hope I have a change of clothes for the coffee that spews out of my nose, runs down my chin and all over my shirt!!! (I'm being a little evil this morning-- :D ). I think this puts to rest the theory that she just wants to be left alone. People who want to be left alone simply do not post nude or semi-nude on the cover of a national magazine. I thinks she needs counseling in a serious way, just like I think Tom Cruise needs counseling and that poor, poor soul he sucked into his twisted life.

Debbie

p.s. I'd love to hear your thoughts.

ClaraB
06-29-2006, 06:49 AM
I dunno - wouldn't no clothes be an improvement over the cr@p she wears now???

KristiB
06-29-2006, 06:59 AM
I don't feel sorry for her. She's definitely putting herself out there.

She doesn't have an album/movie/tv show/book to promote. Just herself.

As far as posing nude she'd better do all that stuff now and save her $$ because one day people won't be watching her anymore. And it's not like she has a lot of talent to fall back on either.

DeeK
06-29-2006, 07:27 AM
She looked pretty in the picture, but heck ...it's hardly shocking. It's been done before. Nude pregnant woman on the cover just doesn't have the shock power it had with Demi....ya know...kinda been there, done that. :::yawn:::

luv2run
06-29-2006, 07:54 AM
I loved Demi's cover shot. She just looked beautiful, in awe of her gorgeous, pregnant body. I guess Britney just conjures up the image of "nekked" trailer trash trying to make a buck. BTW, "nekked" was the way my grandfather pronounced naked when he meant someone was "up to no good". He passed away several years ago but remembering some of the things he said still makes me laugh!

Yep, ClaraB, you're definitely right, at least she is making no attempt at covering the girls this time-- :rolleyes: ! Looks better than having them loosely covered and about to break free at any moment!

ChristieinMB
06-29-2006, 08:25 AM
I do agree the shot is better than the look she had in her interview with Matt. She looks better without the trashy clothes. But, as mentioned, the pregnant nude cover has already been done. yawn...
Go away, already.

CompassRose
06-29-2006, 08:28 AM
I still feel sorry for her. She's so pathetic, and so dumb, and so completely out of her depth as "rich and famous". Sigh. Not that we really need another celebrity skank; there are already plenty. Why is it that the only people who get famous are either from celebrity lineage, or skanks, or both? Where's the talent?