Grace
07-01-2006, 10:46 AM
DH is a real estate appraiser. He did an appraisal for a guy who didn't like the outcome of the appraisal (claimed it wasn't high enough - the usual claim). The guy reported DH to the IL Dpt of Financial and Prof. Regulations, the agency that is in charge of his license. We believe this guy reported DH vindictively, since there is nothing wrong with the report. DH went way out of his way to try and be as accurate as possible - he even combed tax records for by-owner sales to try to prove the value the guy was claiming (very few appraisers do this - it's time consuming - most just stick to the listings on the multiple listing service). The guy tried to tell DH that a real estate agent told him the property was worth much more. DH asked him to produce the comparable sales that the agent was able to find to prove that and he'd be happy to look at them and use them if they were appropriate comparable sales (of course he could produce nothing). DH also offered to meet this person and go over the report with him and explain how he arrived at everything. The guy was NOT interested, got mad, kept saying, "what are you going to do to fix this?" DH kept saying, there is nothing to fix. The value is what it is. If you think you can sell your property for more, go ahead. An appraisal is not necessarily an indication of what every person would be willing to pay for a property - it's just a report about the values of similar properties in the area. That's it. An appraisal is supposed to report the facts only, as they are on that date, given the information that was available. The guy kept pressuring DH to somehow make the report reflect the value HE thought it was, DH refused, so the guy finally said, "well then I have to do what I have to do" and hung up. So today we get a certified letter from the IL Dept. of Fin. & Prof Regulations telling us there was a claim filed against us by this guy. Lovely.
If we want to sue this guy for harrassment and for filing a false report, would that be small claims court? Would we likely have a case? Would we have to prove damages?
The damage as we see it, is now every bank that we try to get as a new client makes you fill out an application to be one of their certified appraisers. One of the questions is "have you ever had a complaint filed against you?". By answering yes (which until now has always been a no), banks would potentially not accept us as a certified appraiser.
I can't believe people who are just disgruntled and vengeful have the power to possibly hinder our ability to do business in the future. It's crazy.
At this point we have to send in a report to the agency explaining our side of things, then there will be a ruling (I assume). I'm quite confident in DH's very excellent and above-board work, that there will be no action against him or his license, but just having to go through this to defend ourselves and to now be forced to answer "yes" to the "have you ever had a complaint filed against you" question for any new business we try to acquire (in addition to our E&O insurance which may lead to higher premiums) makes me want to teach these kinds of people a lesson.
Kind of like people who call Dept. of Children and Family Services to cause trouble for people they hate. I've seen Judge Judy hear cases about that, and if she thinks the people called DCFS vindictively, and for no real cause, she makes a judgement against them. I'm wondering if this is the same kind of thing.
Anyone know? Any words of wisdom? Anyone been there, done that?
If we want to sue this guy for harrassment and for filing a false report, would that be small claims court? Would we likely have a case? Would we have to prove damages?
The damage as we see it, is now every bank that we try to get as a new client makes you fill out an application to be one of their certified appraisers. One of the questions is "have you ever had a complaint filed against you?". By answering yes (which until now has always been a no), banks would potentially not accept us as a certified appraiser.
I can't believe people who are just disgruntled and vengeful have the power to possibly hinder our ability to do business in the future. It's crazy.
At this point we have to send in a report to the agency explaining our side of things, then there will be a ruling (I assume). I'm quite confident in DH's very excellent and above-board work, that there will be no action against him or his license, but just having to go through this to defend ourselves and to now be forced to answer "yes" to the "have you ever had a complaint filed against you" question for any new business we try to acquire (in addition to our E&O insurance which may lead to higher premiums) makes me want to teach these kinds of people a lesson.
Kind of like people who call Dept. of Children and Family Services to cause trouble for people they hate. I've seen Judge Judy hear cases about that, and if she thinks the people called DCFS vindictively, and for no real cause, she makes a judgement against them. I'm wondering if this is the same kind of thing.
Anyone know? Any words of wisdom? Anyone been there, done that?