
Originally Posted by
Hoodone
For me, there are some things that lighten well, such as cakes, muffins and quick breads, and some that don't lighten so well, like scones and cookies. I've tried some of the CL scones and don't think they are worth it. Light calories that don't taste good just aren't worth it.
These Starbucks imitation scones are good, better that the Starbucks ones, actually. I make them using whatever milk I have on hand, but do use the full amount of butter and eggs. Also, I use half WW flour. I don't bother with the double glaze, just use the spiced one. They are good enough to leave off the glaze if you want to cut back there. They also work well cut in pretty tiny pieces, like a 1" triangle (each side measuring that), and freeze well, too. So perhaps make a batch of small ones, freeze them, and pull one out only occasionally?
Starbucks Pumpkin Scones
I agree that scones sometimes aren't worth lightening. I just made this Starbucks recipe for the first time recently and they were fabulous. I used fat-free half and half and did reduce the butter by one T. I also made as mini scones...so even eating 2 at a time, I got well more than 6 servings. I was out of powdered sugar, so didn't make either glaze and they were good even plain. Just out of curiousity, I plugged my version into Mastercook and for 8 servings they are about 8 grams of fat/239 calories each. IMO, not too bad for a good scone recipe!
The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue. - Anonymous